[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
25 Mar 2004 17:47:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Jari Aalto+mail.emacs) writes:
>
> > The "de facto" situation for long has been that everybody
> > maps M-g to goto-line. People advice that in newsgroups,
> > because it is indeed the most logical key.
>
> Seconded. If no other binding can be found, we can override it in
> enriched text mode with a local binding, but as a global binding,
> goto-line is certainly much more generally useful.
BTW, Gnus rebinds M-g:
M-g runs the command gnus-summary-rescan-group
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
Kim F. Storm <=
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/28
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28