[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Jérôme Marant |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:50:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>> What if users prefer M-g to run goto-line?
>
> They are free to rebind it on their own. That's not a concern.
>
> A concern however is that M-g _is_ frequently rebound by users and
> installations to goto-line, and so maybe we should spend some thought
> about a recommendation where the font selection commands should go on
> installations that rebind M-g, to avoid more inconsistency in actual
> installations than can be avoided.
If anyone usually rebind it, it would make sense to make it a default
binding, wouldn't it? When you need to fire up Emacs where you don't
have your .emacs around, having such default bindings is generaly
not a bad idea.
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/28
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/28
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/28
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Robert J. Chassell, 2004/03/28
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/28