[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
|
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
|
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
|
Date: |
26 Mar 2004 01:13:47 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>
> > BTW, Gnus rebinds M-g:
> >
> > M-g runs the command gnus-summary-rescan-group
>
> I see no problem with that: in the summary buffer you would not want
> to jump to a particular line, anyway. It is a generated buffer
> without external access that would make line numbers a useful metric.
It is no problem if M-g is goto-line.
My point was that it would be a problem if M-g runs next-error -- which
should really be available in ALL modes.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/28
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27