[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Per Abrahamsen |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:10:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Joachim Nilsson <address@hidden> writes:
> Personally I've actually started getting used to "M-g *" for setting
> faces when I write in LaTeX. I find it very useful actually.
Excellent!
When I preach Emacs to the heathens, my main point is that Emacs gives
you an environment that allows you to use the same keys to issue
*semantically* equivalent operations, even though those operations
have different textual representations depending on what kind of text
your editing.
The canonical example is "M-;", to comment out stuff.
So even though M-g currently is rarely used, I believe there should be
*some* common keybinding for setting fonts for the current mode. It
doesn't has to be M-g, but it should be there. It is what Emacs is
all about. At least, as I preach the gospel.
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto+mail.emacs, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/28