|
From: | Mathias Dahl |
Subject: | Re: Info tutorial is out of date |
Date: | Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:57:00 +0200 |
> Key bindings *are* shortcuts - what's wrong with that? 1) They are > commonly called "keyboard shortcuts" by many people. 2) They are > shorter (quicker) to use than clicking menus and links with a mouse - > don't you agree? They are shorter (quicker) than using `M-x' - don't > you agree? What is it about "shortcut" that sets you off? It's one of those sort of words/phrases so beloved of journalists/salesmen/politicians that can be used to denigrate something, yet the j/s/p, when called on it, can convincingly pretend it was totally innocent and factual, as you have done in the preceding paragraph.
I understood Drew perfectly and I did not stop a second thinking that he might have used it in a "journalist" sense. The reason is probably that he and me have always used the same name for it, "keyboard shortcut". Of all the things I have heard people call this during the ten years I have been using computers professionally, this is the most common of them (I use Windows at work). In the Emacs world, "key sequence" is probably more correct, at least technically.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |