[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nested sit-for's
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: Nested sit-for's |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:05:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) |
> If we simply document that "timers (and process filters) should avoid
> using sit-for", it should be clear to the reader that rare exceptions
> may exist (especially if we add a comment to jit-lock-stealth-fontify
> stating this). After the release, we can probably rework
> jit-lock-stealth-fontify to avoid using sit-for, but I don't think the
> current situation is bad enough to block the release.
If you accept a pre-command-hook the attached patch would be a first
step in that direction.
*** jit-lock.el.~1.53.~ Tue Aug 15 10:00:50 2006
--- jit-lock.el Thu Aug 17 17:52:02 2006
***************
*** 220,229 ****
(jit-lock-refontify)
;; Install an idle timer for stealth fontification.
! (when (and jit-lock-stealth-time (null jit-lock-stealth-timer))
! (setq jit-lock-stealth-timer
! (run-with-idle-timer jit-lock-stealth-time t
! 'jit-lock-stealth-fontify)))
;; Init deferred fontification timer.
(when (and jit-lock-defer-time (null jit-lock-defer-timer))
--- 220,231 ----
(jit-lock-refontify)
;; Install an idle timer for stealth fontification.
! (when jit-lock-stealth-time
! (add-hook 'pre-command-hook 'jit-lock-reset-stealth-buffers nil t)
! (when (null jit-lock-stealth-timer)
! (setq jit-lock-stealth-timer
! (run-with-idle-timer
! jit-lock-stealth-time t 'jit-lock-stealth-fontify))))
;; Init deferred fontification timer.
(when (and jit-lock-defer-time (null jit-lock-defer-timer))
***************
*** 265,270 ****
--- 267,273 ----
(setq jit-lock-defer-timer nil)))
;; Remove hooks.
+ (remove-hook 'pre-command-hook 'jit-lock-reset-stealth-buffers t)
(remove-hook 'after-change-functions 'jit-lock-after-change t)
(remove-hook 'fontification-functions 'jit-lock-function))))
***************
*** 386,399 ****
;; eagerly extend the refontified region with
;; jit-lock-after-change-extend-region-functions.
(when (< start orig-start)
! (lexical-let ((start start)
(orig-start orig-start)
(buf (current-buffer)))
(run-with-timer
0 nil (lambda ()
! (with-buffer-prepared-for-jit-lock
! (put-text-property start orig-start
! 'fontified t buf))))))
;; Find the start of the next chunk, if any.
(setq start (text-property-any next end 'fontified nil))))))))
--- 389,403 ----
;; eagerly extend the refontified region with
;; jit-lock-after-change-extend-region-functions.
(when (< start orig-start)
! (lexical-let ((start start)
(orig-start orig-start)
(buf (current-buffer)))
(run-with-timer
0 nil (lambda ()
! (with-current-buffer buf
! (with-buffer-prepared-for-jit-lock
! (put-text-property start orig-start
! 'fontified t)))))))
;; Find the start of the next chunk, if any.
(setq start (text-property-any next end 'fontified nil))))))))
***************
*** 402,408 ****
;;; Stealth fontification.
(defsubst jit-lock-stealth-chunk-start (around)
! "Return the start of the next chunk to fontify around position AROUND..
Value is nil if there is nothing more to fontify."
(if (zerop (buffer-size))
nil
--- 406,412 ----
;;; Stealth fontification.
(defsubst jit-lock-stealth-chunk-start (around)
! "Return the start of the next chunk to fontify around position AROUND.
Value is nil if there is nothing more to fontify."
(if (zerop (buffer-size))
nil
***************
*** 442,513 ****
(t next))))
result))))
(defun jit-lock-stealth-fontify ()
"Fontify buffers stealthily.
This functions is called after Emacs has been idle for
`jit-lock-stealth-time' seconds."
! ;; I used to check `inhibit-read-only' here, but I can't remember why.
-stef
! (unless (or executing-kbd-macro
memory-full
(window-minibuffer-p (selected-window)))
! (let ((buffers (buffer-list))
! (outer-buffer (current-buffer))
minibuffer-auto-raise
! message-log-max)
! (with-local-quit
! (while (and buffers (not (input-pending-p)))
! (with-current-buffer (pop buffers)
! (when jit-lock-mode
! ;; This is funny. Calling sit-for with 3rd arg non-nil
! ;; so that it doesn't redisplay, internally calls
! ;; wait_reading_process_input also with a parameter
! ;; saying "don't redisplay." Since this function here
! ;; is called periodically, this effectively leads to
! ;; process output not being redisplayed at all because
! ;; redisplay_internal is never called. (That didn't
! ;; work in the old redisplay either.) So, we learn that
! ;; we mustn't call sit-for that way here. But then, we
! ;; have to be cautious not to call sit-for in a widened
! ;; buffer, since this could display hidden parts of that
! ;; buffer. This explains the seemingly weird use of
! ;; save-restriction/widen here.
!
! (with-temp-message (if jit-lock-stealth-verbose
! (concat "JIT stealth lock "
! (buffer-name)))
!
! ;; In the following code, the `sit-for' calls cause a
! ;; redisplay, so it's required that the
! ;; buffer-modified flag of a buffer that is displayed
! ;; has the right value---otherwise the mode line of
! ;; an unmodified buffer would show a `*'.
! (let (start
! (nice (or jit-lock-stealth-nice 0))
! (point (point-min)))
! (while (and (setq start
! (jit-lock-stealth-chunk-start point))
! ;; In case sit-for runs any timers,
! ;; give them the expected current buffer.
! (with-current-buffer outer-buffer
! (sit-for nice)))
!
! ;; fontify a block.
! (jit-lock-fontify-now start (+ start jit-lock-chunk-size))
! ;; If stealth jit-locking is done backwards, this leads to
! ;; excessive O(n^2) refontification. -stef
! ;; (when (>= jit-lock-context-unfontify-pos start)
! ;; (setq jit-lock-context-unfontify-pos end))
!
! ;; Wait a little if load is too high.
! (when (and jit-lock-stealth-load
! (> (car (load-average)) jit-lock-stealth-load))
! ;; In case sit-for runs any timers,
! ;; give them the expected current buffer.
! (with-current-buffer outer-buffer
! (sit-for (or jit-lock-stealth-time 30))))))))))))))
!
!
;;; Deferred fontification.
--- 446,492 ----
(t next))))
result))))
+ (defvar jit-lock-stealth-buffers nil
+ "List of buffers that should be fontified stealthily.
+ Installed in `pre-command-hook' when `jit-lock-stealth-time' is non-nil
+ and JIT lock is turned on.")
+
+ (defun jit-lock-reset-stealth-buffers ()
+ "Reset `jit-lock-stealth-buffers' to nil."
+ (setq jit-lock-stealth-buffers nil))
(defun jit-lock-stealth-fontify ()
"Fontify buffers stealthily.
This functions is called after Emacs has been idle for
`jit-lock-stealth-time' seconds."
! (unless (or (input-pending-p)
! (eq jit-lock-stealth-buffers t)
! executing-kbd-macro
memory-full
(window-minibuffer-p (selected-window)))
! (unless jit-lock-stealth-buffers
! (setq jit-lock-stealth-buffers (or (buffer-list) t)))
! (let ((buffer (car jit-lock-stealth-buffers))
minibuffer-auto-raise
! message-log-max
! start)
! (when (and buffer
! (or (not jit-lock-stealth-load)
! (<= (car (load-average)) jit-lock-stealth-load)))
! (with-local-quit
! (with-current-buffer buffer
! (if (and jit-lock-mode
! (setq start (jit-lock-stealth-chunk-start (point))))
! ;; fontify a block.
! (with-temp-message (if jit-lock-stealth-verbose
! (concat "JIT stealth lock "
! (buffer-name)))
! (jit-lock-fontify-now start (+ start jit-lock-chunk-size)))
! (setq jit-lock-stealth-buffers
! (or (cdr jit-lock-stealth-buffers) t)))))))
! (unless (eq jit-lock-stealth-buffers t)
! (run-at-time (min jit-lock-stealth-nice 0.1) nil
! 'jit-lock-stealth-fontify))))
;;; Deferred fontification.
- Re: Nested sit-for's, (continued)
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/16
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's,
martin rudalics <=
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/18
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/18
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/21