[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nested sit-for's
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Nested sit-for's |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:05:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Just a first shot. Try the revision.
>>
>> My initial testing/impression: Works like a charm! Thanks!
>
> Does it have any effect on the cursor blinking problem?
I haven't seen it since I applied that patch ... but it is still too early
to make any firm conclusions.
IIUC, the recent addition of current-idle-time by RMS was supposed to
fix the sit-for in jit-lock problem in a different way. But so far,
RMS' changes to jit-lock have not been installed... What's up???
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Nested sit-for's, (continued)
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/18
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/18
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/22
Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17