[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nested sit-for's
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: Nested sit-for's |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:03:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) |
Is the pre-command-hook installed permanently, or only when jit-lock is
active?
IMHO, using a permanently installed pre-command-hook is not acceptable, but
it may be ok if only used temporarily...
But why is this needed at all?
Just a first shot. Try the revision.
*** jit-lock.el.~1.53.~ Tue Aug 15 10:00:50 2006
--- jit-lock.el Fri Aug 18 10:57:54 2006
***************
*** 386,399 ****
;; eagerly extend the refontified region with
;; jit-lock-after-change-extend-region-functions.
(when (< start orig-start)
! (lexical-let ((start start)
(orig-start orig-start)
(buf (current-buffer)))
(run-with-timer
0 nil (lambda ()
! (with-buffer-prepared-for-jit-lock
! (put-text-property start orig-start
! 'fontified t buf))))))
;; Find the start of the next chunk, if any.
(setq start (text-property-any next end 'fontified nil))))))))
--- 386,400 ----
;; eagerly extend the refontified region with
;; jit-lock-after-change-extend-region-functions.
(when (< start orig-start)
! (lexical-let ((start start)
(orig-start orig-start)
(buf (current-buffer)))
(run-with-timer
0 nil (lambda ()
! (with-current-buffer buf
! (with-buffer-prepared-for-jit-lock
! (put-text-property start orig-start
! 'fontified t)))))))
;; Find the start of the next chunk, if any.
(setq start (text-property-any next end 'fontified nil))))))))
***************
*** 402,408 ****
;;; Stealth fontification.
(defsubst jit-lock-stealth-chunk-start (around)
! "Return the start of the next chunk to fontify around position AROUND..
Value is nil if there is nothing more to fontify."
(if (zerop (buffer-size))
nil
--- 403,409 ----
;;; Stealth fontification.
(defsubst jit-lock-stealth-chunk-start (around)
! "Return the start of the next chunk to fontify around position AROUND.
Value is nil if there is nothing more to fontify."
(if (zerop (buffer-size))
nil
***************
*** 442,513 ****
(t next))))
result))))
! (defun jit-lock-stealth-fontify ()
"Fontify buffers stealthily.
! This functions is called after Emacs has been idle for
`jit-lock-stealth-time' seconds."
! ;; I used to check `inhibit-read-only' here, but I can't remember why.
-stef
! (unless (or executing-kbd-macro
memory-full
! (window-minibuffer-p (selected-window)))
! (let ((buffers (buffer-list))
! (outer-buffer (current-buffer))
minibuffer-auto-raise
! message-log-max)
! (with-local-quit
! (while (and buffers (not (input-pending-p)))
! (with-current-buffer (pop buffers)
! (when jit-lock-mode
! ;; This is funny. Calling sit-for with 3rd arg non-nil
! ;; so that it doesn't redisplay, internally calls
! ;; wait_reading_process_input also with a parameter
! ;; saying "don't redisplay." Since this function here
! ;; is called periodically, this effectively leads to
! ;; process output not being redisplayed at all because
! ;; redisplay_internal is never called. (That didn't
! ;; work in the old redisplay either.) So, we learn that
! ;; we mustn't call sit-for that way here. But then, we
! ;; have to be cautious not to call sit-for in a widened
! ;; buffer, since this could display hidden parts of that
! ;; buffer. This explains the seemingly weird use of
! ;; save-restriction/widen here.
!
(with-temp-message (if jit-lock-stealth-verbose
(concat "JIT stealth lock "
(buffer-name)))
!
! ;; In the following code, the `sit-for' calls cause a
! ;; redisplay, so it's required that the
! ;; buffer-modified flag of a buffer that is displayed
! ;; has the right value---otherwise the mode line of
! ;; an unmodified buffer would show a `*'.
! (let (start
! (nice (or jit-lock-stealth-nice 0))
! (point (point-min)))
! (while (and (setq start
! (jit-lock-stealth-chunk-start point))
! ;; In case sit-for runs any timers,
! ;; give them the expected current buffer.
! (with-current-buffer outer-buffer
! (sit-for nice)))
!
! ;; fontify a block.
! (jit-lock-fontify-now start (+ start jit-lock-chunk-size))
! ;; If stealth jit-locking is done backwards, this leads to
! ;; excessive O(n^2) refontification. -stef
! ;; (when (>= jit-lock-context-unfontify-pos start)
! ;; (setq jit-lock-context-unfontify-pos end))
!
! ;; Wait a little if load is too high.
! (when (and jit-lock-stealth-load
! (> (car (load-average)) jit-lock-stealth-load))
! ;; In case sit-for runs any timers,
! ;; give them the expected current buffer.
! (with-current-buffer outer-buffer
! (sit-for (or jit-lock-stealth-time 30))))))))))))))
!
!
;;; Deferred fontification.
--- 443,487 ----
(t next))))
result))))
+ (defvar jit-lock-stealth-buffers nil
+ "List of buffers that should be fontified stealthily.")
! (defun jit-lock-stealth-fontify (&optional repeat)
"Fontify buffers stealthily.
! This function is called repeatedly after Emacs has been idle for
`jit-lock-stealth-time' seconds."
! (unless (or (input-pending-p)
! executing-kbd-macro
memory-full
! (window-minibuffer-p (selected-window))
! (null (if repeat
! jit-lock-stealth-buffers
! (setq jit-lock-stealth-buffers (buffer-list)))))
! (let ((buffer (car jit-lock-stealth-buffers))
minibuffer-auto-raise
! message-log-max
! start load-delay)
! (when (or (not jit-lock-stealth-load)
! (or (<= (car (load-average)) jit-lock-stealth-load)
! (not (setq load-delay t))))
! (with-current-buffer buffer
! (if (and jit-lock-mode
! (setq start (jit-lock-stealth-chunk-start (point))))
! ;; Fontify one block.
(with-temp-message (if jit-lock-stealth-verbose
(concat "JIT stealth lock "
(buffer-name)))
! (jit-lock-fontify-now start (+ start jit-lock-chunk-size)))
! ;; Nothing to fontify.
! (setq jit-lock-stealth-buffers (cdr jit-lock-stealth-buffers)))))
! (when jit-lock-stealth-buffers
! ;; The 0.1s are completely arbitrary here and should be replaced by
! ;; something more appropriate.
! (run-at-time
! (if load-delay
! (min jit-lock-stealth-time 0.1)
! (min jit-lock-stealth-nice 0.1))
! nil 'jit-lock-stealth-fontify t)))))
;;; Deferred fontification.
- Re: Nested sit-for's, (continued)
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's,
martin rudalics <=
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/18
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/21