[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nested sit-for's
|
From: |
martin rudalics |
|
Subject: |
Re: Nested sit-for's |
|
Date: |
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:52:54 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) |
> IIUC, the recent addition of current-idle-time by RMS was supposed to
> fix the sit-for in jit-lock problem in a different way. But so far,
> RMS' changes to jit-lock have not been installed... What's up???
IIUC, `current-idle-time' would permit to replace the ugliness of my
`run-at-time' with yet another `run-with-idle-timer'. Hopefully.
- Re: Nested sit-for's, (continued)
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/18
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/18
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's,
martin rudalics <=
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/22
Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
RE: Nested sit-for's, Drew Adams, 2006/08/17