[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EMACS_INT cleanup
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: EMACS_INT cleanup |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:12:18 +0200 |
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 00:07, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Do we want to allow strings to be more than 2GB big?
If we ever support buffers > 2GB, (buffer-string) > 2GB.
Not likely to be used, but you never know.
Juanma
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, (continued)
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Miles Bader, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24