[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EMACS_INT cleanup
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: EMACS_INT cleanup |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:46:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
> If we ever support buffers > 2GB, (buffer-string) > 2GB.
Yes. But would anyone ever say
(format (buffer-string))
or
(message "%s" (buffer-string))
with a 2GB buffer?
Hm. Well, actually, I guess it might happen inadvertently.
So. Fix up or not fix up?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, (continued)
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Miles Bader, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24