[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EMACS_INT cleanup
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: EMACS_INT cleanup |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 02:01:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
> I mean, it may be nice and orthogonal and stuff, but... I don't know.
> And does using more longs on 64-bit machines than previously slow Emacs
> down any?
AFAIK using 64bit local variables on 64bit systems should have as only
cost the added stack use when spilling those vars on the stack.
Stefan
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, (continued)
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Miles Bader, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24