[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EMACS_INT cleanup
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: EMACS_INT cleanup |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:58:54 +0200 |
> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:02:43 +0200
>
> void
> message3 (Lisp_Object m, int nbytes, int multibyte)
>
> So we can only do a message that's 2GB big? Well, OK, but is that a
> problem?
Why bother thinking? Why not just replace int with EMACS_INT?
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, (continued)
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Miles Bader, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, David Kastrup, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/23