[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Suggested experimental test
From: |
Stephan Mueller |
Subject: |
RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Suggested experimental test |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:11:39 +0000 |
Since opinions are explicitly being solicited, and since I have not encountered
a particular point in my not-necessarily-comprehensive reading of this thread,
I'll add one:
I use C-o (usually followed by C-n) many times a day, instead of <Enter>, in
order to suppress re-indentation of the current line in cases where that
re-indentation will be incorrect for my purposes**.
Needing to hit C-o twice would make the workaround more painful. I expect I
would end up rebinding in my .emacs to restore the current behaviour.
Also, I find myself nodding in agreement to the argument (apologies for not
recalling who made it in this thread) that as a long-standing and fairly
'basic' binding, it is in use in other editors that try to be Emacs-like.
Changing the default behaviour here would introduce confusion to the world and
confound muscle memory.
stephan();
** Of course, addressing the indentation issue would be good, but that
perpetually remains a task for another day -- it's not a configurable
behaviour, and will require me to do substantial research into cperl mode to
understand more. That said, even in cases not involving my oddly formatted
perl, auto-indentation seems generally accurate enough to keep using, and
inaccurate enough to need a workaround multiple times daily.
-----Original Message-----
From: Emacs-devel <emacs-devel-bounces+stephan=sbmueller.net@gnu.org> On Behalf
Of Lars Ingebrigtsen
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 5:06 AM
To: Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Suggested experimental test
Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org> writes:
> Well... the suggested experiment does not remove C-o, it changes C-o
> in a way that is, I believe, painless.
Sorry; I didn't read the patch carefully. So it basically moves `C-o'
to `C-o C-o' (and makes the `C-o' prefix open for new commands)?
I don't use `C-o' myself, so I can't really say to what degree this
would be annoying or not for users. Any `C-o' users who have an opinion
here?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog:
https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flars.ingebrigtsen.no%2F&data=04%7C01%7CStephan.Mueller%40microsoft.com%7C6defb25382ae4b50aabc08d8ed2afd3e%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637520116190706836%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=dsMofHZVHi9n24IzfOxmFyXFOEVpV9GttwoJ6kXtwWA%3D&reserved=0
- RE: [External] : Re: Suggested experimental test, (continued)
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Jean Louis, 2021/03/23
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Yuri Khan, 2021/03/23
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Gregory Heytings, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Thierry Volpiatto, 2021/03/22
- RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Suggested experimental test,
Stephan Mueller <=
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/03/22
- Re: Suggested experimental test, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/23