Re: Can watermarking Unicode text using invisible differences sneak through Emacs, or can Emacs detect it?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Cc: psainty@orcon.net.nz, luangruo@yahoo.com,
>       kevin.legouguec@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 23:13:16 -0500
> 
>   > Then please suggest replacements you consider to be better, and let's
>   > make those replacements.  We are not bound by what Lynx does, we just
>   > used that as a source.
> 
> For each character whose name has the form
> 
>   LATIN (SMALL|CAPITAL) LETTER \1 WITH \2
> 
> if the terminal can't display that, it should display \1
> (in the appropriate case), followed by the graphical form of \2.
> 
> Thus, for
> 
>   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH MACRON
> 
> it should display as `A' followed by a macron.
> 
> For each character whose name has the form
> 
>   latin (small|capital) letter \1 with \2 and \3
> 
> if the terminal can't display that, but it can display \1 with \2,
> it should display
> 
>   LATIN (SMALL|CAPITAL) LETTER \1 WITH \2
> 
> followed by the graphical form of \3.
>   
> Otherwise, it should display
> 
>   \1 followed by the graphical form of \2 followed by the graphical form of 
> \3.

Thanks, but I thought you'd propose replacements for the equivalents
of the diacritics (i.e. those "graphical forms"), not an algorithm to
combine them.