Re: etags name collision.

[Ergus]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 06:51:11PM +0800, Po Lu wrote:
> Ergus <spacibba@aol.com> writes:
>
> > I use OpenBSD in my servers daily and all my team around use vim and
> > neovim with Universal Ctags with no issue.  Universal ctags can generate
> > emacs tags, json, legacy and modern ctags, xref... if there is some
> > problem the right to do is to open an issue in their project...
>
> vim and neovim are not vi and mg, and are not standardized utilities
> either.
So you mean that we should maintain this executable with an old name
that collides with a better modern one; useful for all the vim (and
other editors) users, just to support two editors that are not emacs,
very popular and with minimal maintenance...

Any way I am tired of this pointless discussion... When things start
like this in the list we end up going nowhere.

Best,
Ergus