Re: OKURI-NASI

[Stefan Kangas]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> We could, alternatively, just include the generated file in git (because
> it seldom changes), but...  On the one hand, it would save a lot of
> electricity, but on the other hand, including generated files in git is
> a bit tedious.

I currently synch SKK-JISYO.L against upstream once a month [but there
has been no changes to this file since December last year].  It should
be easy to include a step recreating the generated file and committing
that too, if that's what we want.