[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Aug 2022 18:46:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> writes:
> That would also get us another native Wayland backend, and probably one
> that would could more heartily recommend to people.
That'd be nice -- but do we have any concrete reason to believe that Qt
is going to suck less than Gtk? Everybody has a tendency to think that
something like this must surely be great -- until they start actually
working with it, and then they discover all the things that just doesn't
work (as we found out with Gtk, but only after a few years of actually
working with it).
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, (continued)
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Robert Pluim, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Sean Whitton, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Sean Whitton, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, tomas, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Richard Stallman, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, tomas, 2022/08/23
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Óscar Fuentes, 2022/08/21
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/21
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Óscar Fuentes, 2022/08/21