Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance)

[Stefan Kangas]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> The intent is for Emacs 29 to include several modes based on
> tree-sitter, and several others to have optional features based on
> tree-sitter.  Based on the state of the soon-to-be-merged branch, I
> see no reason to declare its support as experimental.

My comment was more general, as IIUC we are still seeing quite a bit of
movement even in the low-level fundamentals on that branch, as recently
as the last week or two.  But if you and others are happy to declare our
tree-sitter support stable, so much the better.