[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter a
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance) |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Nov 2022 20:51:13 +0200 |
> From: Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no>
> Cc: casouri@gmail.com, jostein@kjonigsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:46:07 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Btw, should we add C# to c-ts-mode.el? Or did we already discuss that and
> > decided against? I don't remember, sorry.
>
> I don't think we decided against, and we didn't really discuss it. IIRC
> your "challenge" was for the cc modes already included in emacs, and C#
> is not that. But seeing how there's a functioning cc-based c#-mode, I
> could tweak that to include both. The Cc mode variant is very stable
> and have been for some time already. There's no need to maintain the
> one in ELPA, and as I'm the author of it I think we can merge both? So
> we can have in-tree support for c# whether or not you have tree-sitter
> enabled? I can whip up a patch for that if you want, or we could just
> add the tree-sitter variant. In any case, I think c#-mode should
> probably not be inside of c-ts-mode, considering that it's not a
> superset of C, like C++, but its own entity.
>
> What do you think?
It's fine with me to have C# support both with and without tree-sitter, if it's
indeed easy.
Thanks.
- Re: Standardized access to a REPL, (continued)
- Re: Standardized access to a REPL, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/19
- Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance), Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/19
- Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance), Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/19
- Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance), Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/19
- Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance), Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/19
- Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance), Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/19
Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance), Yuan Fu, 2022/11/18
Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance), Stefan Kangas, 2022/11/19
Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance), Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/19
Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance), Stefan Kangas, 2022/11/19
Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance), Theodor Thornhill, 2022/11/19
Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance), Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/19
Re: Suggesting that feature/tree-sitter be merged (was Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance), Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/19
Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance, Yuan Fu, 2022/11/19