emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Orgmode] Re: how to customize (inactive) timestamp textual format


From: Richard Riley
Subject: [Orgmode] Re: how to customize (inactive) timestamp textual format
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:45:11 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)

Giovanni Ridolfi <address@hidden> writes:

> Stefano Zacchiroli <address@hidden> writes:
>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:37:16PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>>>>(I've only now noticed that the FAQ it not part of the installed
>>>>>org-mode documentation, at least not in my distribution package: any
>>>>>reason for that?)
>>>>
>>>>I think it's not included because it's part of Worg, which I think
>>>>is only available either in git or on the web. Maybe Worg should
>>>>be included in the standard package.
>>> 
>>> No, I don't see why.  It is on the web, easily accessible.
>>
>> People working offline?
> How long?  ;-)

Long enough not to be able to read Worg?

>
>> I think it would make sense to "freeze" wort at each org-mode release
>> and ship a copy of it in a way that makes it integrated in the Emacs
>> help system.
>
> I disagree.

I agree with him that a Worg image would be nice.

> Also EmacsWiki is not shipped in the documentation of Emacs, but I found
> important solutions (e.g. regarding newsticker or Gnus, packages 
> integrated with Emacs!) there.

Emacs wiki is totally different. Emacs Wiki covers the whole of the
official Emacs packages AND user contributions which are not shipped
with Emacs. Worg is tightly linked with org-mode only - and the things
used to talk to/interface with org.

>
> In the summary of Org-Mode documentation is written:
> "There is a website for Org [...] additional information, 
> frequently asked questions (FAQ), links to tutorials, etc.  
> This page is located at `http://orgmode.org'."
>
> I think this is enough.

Not if you're offline ;)

The suggestion for the user to clone the worg git is probably the best
but I see no reason, if its not silly amount of work, to include worg
with a org git distribution as a subdir in the same repo.

Benefits would be that Worg could be stamped with same release
markers/tags too and the "local Worg" would be synced with that release.

My 2 pfennigs. Oops. 1.3 cent..

>
> cheers
> Giovanni
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]