On Mon 22 Jan 2007 09:03, Kai Antweiler wrote:
> I don't have experience with any of these three SCMs.
> They all sound good. They all support unix, windows and mac os x.
> And also conversion of old cvs archives.
> Just throw a dice, if no one knows better.
I have been using Mercurial for everything for the past six months or so, and
I really like it. I chose it over the others because it seemed somewhat
better documented (there is a pretty good and mostly complete book on using
it at http://www.red-bean.com/~bos/hgbook.pdf) and it's really fast.
Here is a speed comparison between bazaar and mercurial to get an idea of
performance:
http://sayspy.blogspot.com/2006/11/bazaar-vs-mercurial-unscientific.html
However, lots of people use the other ones as well; any one of them would
probably work great.
Either way, I highly recommend switching to a distributed VCS, *especially*
with Bradley lacking net access. I shudder at the thought of having to merge
big blobs of changes like he has been doing. And, branching becomes trivial!