Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message)

[Karel Gardas]

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Miles Bader wrote:

> Momchil Velikov <address@hidden> writes:
> > Miles> I wonder if arch's default `precious' regexp should have a few more
> > Miles> entries for common source-tree junk added, e.g. autom4te.cache
> > Miles> (actually I wonder if this is more like `junk' or `backup').
> >
> > I'd rather suggest what-changed (and all other commands) not perform
> > stuff, which is a responsibility of tree-lint.
>
> Perhaps that's true for what-changed (though I think commit definitely
> should be doing the tree-lint, that's saved my butt plenty of times),
> but still, my point stands.

100% agree with you, commit certainly need to run tree-lint, although when
using explicit tagging method, errors like added source file, which does
not have explicit tag should be just warnings - exactly like with good old
larch :-)

Thanks,

Karel
--
Karel Gardas                  address@hidden
ObjectSecurity Ltd.           http://www.objectsecurity.com