[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message)

[Miles Bader]

Momchil Velikov <address@hidden> writes:
> Miles> I wonder if arch's default `precious' regexp should have a few more
> Miles> entries for common source-tree junk added, e.g. autom4te.cache
> Miles> (actually I wonder if this is more like `junk' or `backup').
> 
> I'd rather suggest what-changed (and all other commands) not perform
> stuff, which is a responsibility of tree-lint.

Perhaps that's true for what-changed (though I think commit definitely
should be doing the tree-lint, that's saved my butt plenty of times),
but still, my point stands.

-Miles
-- 
"I distrust a research person who is always obviously busy on a task."
   --Robert Frosch, VP, GM Research