|
| From: | Samium Gromoff |
| Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager |
| Date: | Thu, 02 Oct 2003 11:27:02 +0400 |
| User-agent: | Wanderlust/2.11.7 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Wed, 1 Oct 2003 23:40:34 -0700 (PDT),
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> The fs structure I believe is fine indeed. But you have to agree that
> vm-fix-hipte-locking is better than patch-417. I think there was a sort of
> agreement on named patches though.
Every revision have a "summary" field.
tla revisions -s
regards, Samium Gromoff
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |