[Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager

[Pau Aliagas]

On 3 Oct 2003, Miles Bader wrote:

> Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> > It's not that hard to work with multiple commit-to archives at once
> > and, as time has passed, people have been providing little command
> > tweaks that make it even easier.  So, that gives you a two-level
> > namespace and, moreover, one that interacts nicely with units of
> > administrivia like mirroring.
> 
> I'm not sure how it helps solve what I was complaining about though --
> the thing about such `kernel-style' branches would be that there are
> _many_ of them, to the degree that the number of names would be a
> problem for the maintainer himself, not just others looking at his
> archive.  I think you might want two namespaces for branch names:
> `pending', and `applied', with branches moving between them at different
> times (this is what my suggestion of a `hidden' flag was intended to
> simulate, in simple, albeit rather ad-hoc, manner).

Why not have 2 repos?

Pau