Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager

[Miles Bader]

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:11:23AM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
>     > times (this is what my suggestion of a `hidden' flag was intended to
>     > simulate, in simple, albeit rather ad-hoc, manner).
> 
> From what are these names "hidden"?   `tla branches'?  `tla abrowse'?
> `tla log-versions'?   `tla library-branches'?

I think just archive listing operations: `tla abrowse' and `tla branches'
(presumably with a --hidden option to show everything).

In the case of revlibs because you can simply delete any offending branches;
in the case of patch-logs, I think it's less common to look at patch-log
versions, and more interesting to see historical entries (though probably
these would be pruned in the same way you'd prune any excessive patch-log
accumulation after a long time).

-Miles
-- 
o The existentialist, not having a pillow, goes everywhere with the book by
  Sullivan, _I am going to spit on your graves_.