[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:05:34 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> > > I think you get (a), but (b) includes things like the patch
> > > import system that has an automatic "renametool",
> > Yup. I'm surprised that a "changeset-utils" package hasn't yet struck
> > anyone with time to work on it as a good project to start.
> The renametool thing has been written several times for arch, I think.
> At least, my tla-update-ids script does this renaming foo automatically
> (just run it after applying a patch file), as does the python script
> someone (Jan?) posted earlier, and doesn't tla_load_dirs do something
> similar?
I was thinking of something more stand-alone that, for example,
accepts a diff(1) patch on stdin and generates a changeset. And,
for polish, I gather the desire is for a short-cut from a diff in your
mbox to .... something .... (a changeset browser? a tree with the
patch applied? an entry in the patch-queue-manager of lore?)
I'm not too concerned about the particular workflow he might want --
more about having a good toolbox of less-than-ad-hoc components from
which anybody's workflow could be assembled easily enough.
-t
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Samuel Tardieu, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Samuel Tardieu, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Miles Bader, 2003/10/03
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Paul Hedderly, 2003/10/02
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Bruce Stephens, 2003/10/02