Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic)

[Robert Collins]

On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 08:56, Robin Farine wrote:
> >>>>> "Davide" == Davide Libenzi <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
>     Davide> tagline (arch experts suggestion)
>     Davide> +
>     Davide> untagged-source unrecognized (strict commits)
> 
>     Davide> Sounds good ?
> 
> Yes, but then you won't be able to commit in presence of untagged
> sources. You'll need to either adjust your naming conventions and
> classification regexps to move the untagged stuff to the appropriate
> categories (i.e. precious, backup or junk) or, before each commit, to
> carefully look at the output of tla -u for sources lacking a tag and
> then delete the rest.

OR:
use untagged-source precious, which will operate more like CVS does:
* tag-lined or added source will be commited.
* other source will be preserved.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part