[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit
From: |
Zack Brown |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 15:03:20 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:14:26PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> As said I really want to execute add/move/delete-tag, it's a feature. As
> such I've to keep tagline disabled. I don't want to depend on file
> contents for the revision control.
...
> I just feel unreliable with taglines. And I risk pain if somebody sends
> two files with the same arch-id to Linus from two different projects
> (though it's a very small risk). And you force me to watch those
> metadata garbage that annoys me ;)
This is a very strange thread. tla already allows you to choose not to
use taglines, so there doesn't seem to be any reason to argue about it.
So, if we assume you use 'explicit' tagging, then are you still unable to
get what you need from tla? What else is missing, aside from the speedup
issues you've mentioned?
Be well,
Zack
> Andrea - If you prefer relying on open source software, check these links:
> rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.[45]/
> http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
>
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
--
Zack Brown
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robert Collins, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Miles Bader, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Miles Bader, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Tom Lord, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Stig Brautaset, 2003/10/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit,
Zack Brown <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Zack Brown, 2003/10/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Zack Brown, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Robert Anderson, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Ethan Benson, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Robert Anderson, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Robert Anderson, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Robert Collins, 2003/10/05