Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus

[Miles Bader]

On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:22:43AM +0200, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > Which presumes that you lost that functionality in the first place and
> > that has yet to be shown.
> 
> I need ACLs, I need to send emails afterwards. If tla decides not to provide 
> it; I'd like to hear that now so I don't have to look into it further.

There (currently) is no `tla server'; tla uses the filesystem (whether or not
via a remote mechanism); you can do anything you can do with files.

Is there a reason why the other mechanisms that have been proposed for
achieving the same functionality as `ACLs' or mail-via-a-server-hook aren't
sufficient?

-miles
-- 
"Though they may have different meanings, the cries of 'Yeeeee-haw!' and
 'Allahu akbar!' are, in spirit, not actually all that different."