Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus

[Thomas Zander]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 13 October 2003 12:37, Miles Bader wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:22:43AM +0200, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > > Which presumes that you lost that functionality in the first place
> > > and that has yet to be shown.
> >
> > I need ACLs, I need to send emails afterwards. If tla decides not to
> > provide it; I'd like to hear that now so I don't have to look into it
> > further.
...
> Is there a reason why the other mechanisms that have been proposed for
> achieving the same functionality as `ACLs' or mail-via-a-server-hook
> aren't sufficient?

I must apologise for the email you quoted above; I seem to have interpreted 
Tom's email incorrectly his quick reply (the top line in this email) had a 
'you' in there which implied the funtionality was indeed not in tla, but 
you don't really need it anyway
I should have read it as an "I think we provide all the functionality cvs 
provides"

To answer your question; I think that the proposed way of doing ACLs would 
work; although it seems a bit hard to maintain. But I will have to try 
first, naturally.

- -- 
Thomas Zander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ipCfCojCW6H2z/QRAr1nAJ4w9cDIgi9oUkbCHq0xKZPgviat9QCffoc7
4P+34FXrW49Sim6o2VTELZM=
=3Hk9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----