[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2

[Pau Aliagas]

On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Colin Walters wrote:

> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 22:13, Tom Lord wrote:
> 
> > I think this is a good direction but it needs to cook more, along with
> > the patch tracker foo.
> 
> Do you have any specifics?
> For example, would you accept patches to implement "submit-merge" in my
> proposed form?  I think that actually the idea of submitting a merge
> request is a fairly general one, and other types of arch process
> management software could leverage the same architecture (dropping a
> file into a queue or sending a GPG-signed email).

Don't you think that all these scriptable commands should simply belong to 
the contrib/utils category? Not only would be more flexible but we would 
have less bloat in arch.

Pau