[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:06:10 -0800 (PST) |
>> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
>> Would it be practical to allow some sort of compacted patch-log storage
>> for sets of old patch-logs, e.g., a .tar.gz file, managed via explicit
>> user commands?
> Somewhat but consider the timescales.
> From: Tom Lord
> Supposing we put in such a hack. We'll still be living with it
> 3, 5, and 10 years hence. At what timescale will the file
> system bogosities either become fixed or become immaterial?
On the other hand -- or on second thought -- or whatever....
If all you want is something that, in one step, turns some subset of
the log into a compressed tar file and deletes that subset from the
log (and vice versa) --- but _don't_ want various arch commands to
implicitly look at those compressed logs -- yeah, that's probably a
nice convenience command for the 1.2 series.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Robert Collins, 2003/12/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, James Blackwell, 2003/12/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 2003/12/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Robert Collins, 2003/12/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Miles Bader, 2003/12/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Aaron Bentley, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Miles Bader, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tupshin Harper, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Miles Bader, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Thomas Zander, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tupshin Harper, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tupshin Harper, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17