Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented

[Aaron Bentley]

Samuel Tardieu wrote:

> > > > > > "Tom" == Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > > >            
>
>  
>
> > I kind of like this particular implementation-exposing aspect of the
> > interface to the functionality just because it's realistic -- people
> > who get why it's part of "changes" will have a better understanding
> > of how arch works and thus be more effective users of it.
> >    
>
> I don't like it, because each time I do "tla changes" I'll be tempted
> to add "--link" just in case I didn't do it after a commit, update,
> replay or star-merge. Or I won't, because I'll (wrongly) think I've
> done it already.
>  
Well, there's no great *harm* in always using --link, aside from finger 
strain.  I don't use hard-linked trees at the moment, but I'd imagine 
doing "tla commit; tla changes --relink".  Or are you saying you'd like 
relinking to happen automatically in trees where you've done "tla get 
--link"?

Aaron