gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented


From: David Allouche
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:25:55 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 08:03:57AM -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> >I don't like it, because each time I do "tla changes" I'll be tempted
> >to add "--link" just in case I didn't do it after a commit, update,
> >replay or star-merge. Or I won't, because I'll (wrongly) think I've
> >done it already.
> > 
> >
> Well, there's no great *harm* in always using --link, aside from finger 
> strain.  I don't use hard-linked trees at the moment, but I'd imagine 
> doing "tla commit; tla changes --relink".  Or are you saying you'd like 
> relinking to happen automatically in trees where you've done "tla get 
> --link"?

Someone problably already said that in another thread, but why not just
"commit --link". After the archive commit, is done, do a library-add and
relink all source files. No need to check, since we just did a commit we
_know_ that all files are identical to the revlib.

Free advice is worth exactly what it costs.

-- 
                                                            -- ddaa




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]