[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation)
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation) |
Date: |
16 Feb 2004 17:44:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
>> >> Bigger, sure, but "much bigger"? Really?
>> > About two or three orders of magnitude bigger.
>> Huh? You mean that the Emacs archive is about 100 to 1000 times larger
>> than a checked out Emacs tree (which weighs at about 50MB) ?
> No, a revision library.
So you're saying that a revlib is "much bigger" or that what I want is "much
bigger" than a revlib? I think you mean the first.
I already have a revlib (a cache of full-fledged revisions) but
I additionally want to cache things like patches. I don't think those
extra patches will blow up the whole thing by a factor of 100 or 1000.
BTW, while caching the patches, you might as well cache them
pre-signature-checked so you don't need to check them over and over.
As for using a http proxy, it's indeed pretty much what I'd like, except
I wish it'd also work via sftp (but that's minor) and more importantly
I don't know of any good http proxy that is designed for disconnected
operation. Oh, and also I doubt that the usual http servers over which
I download the Arch thingies know that what they serve is immutable and
could thus be tagged as "never check freshness".
Stefan
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Robert Collins, 2004/02/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Charles Duffy, 2004/02/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation),
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16