[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation)
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation) |
|
Date: |
16 Feb 2004 11:31:44 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
>> Bigger, sure, but "much bigger"? Really?
> About two or three orders of magnitude bigger.
Huh? You mean that the Emacs archive is about 100 to 1000 times larger
than a checked out Emacs tree (which weighs at about 50MB) ?
You must not be using the same Arch as I do, or maybe I'm not expressing
myself clearly enough and you misunderstood me.
Stefan
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Robert Collins, 2004/02/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Charles Duffy, 2004/02/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation),
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16