Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Preliminary Arch Cache available

[James Blackwell]

Tom Lord:
> Are you considering the idea of *constructing* desirable cacherevs,
> regardless of whether or not they are actually there upstream?
>
> (I currently think you should but I don't think it's a special case.
> I think that ideally, that behavior will just "fall out, for free"
> from the cache code.)
>
I disagree. I think that revision A in the cache should be identical to
revision A in the archive. Though I've got more reasons, one reason
would be that it may not even be possible to build a fresh cacherev, due
to missing information (think a tag of a version in a no longer existant
archive).


-- 
James Blackwell          Try something fun: For the next 24 hours, give
Smile more!              each person you meet a compliment!

GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400