Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken

[Andrew Suffield]

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:46:28PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
> Sorry! That's just my short-cut of the whole problem. As I've already
> written I don't agree fully with Ivan's statements, but this does not
> change anything on the fact that MD5 is broken.

MD5 is not broken. That's a myth. Stop spreading it.

> Yes, I agree, but combining two hashes from which one is considered broken
> and one is considered weak these days is IMHO less secure than using one
> hash which is considered secure.

Your opinion is stupid and wrong, and there are no hashes which are
'considered secure' anyway.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature