[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and inhouse use?
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and inhouse use? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2006 11:37:55 +0200 (CEST) |
> As I said to David, I was talking about code that offers a
> service to the public.
So every Web site, every shell provider, every search engine
running any GPL software would have to distribute source to every
user.
Every user who has access to the Program, yes. This is all perfecly
reasonable.
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, (continued)
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/16
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Richard Tobin, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, John Hasler, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18