[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and inhouse use?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and inhouse use? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 May 2006 00:08:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:
> > I was answering a specific concern `code that offers a service to
> > the public'.
>
> Which would include a copy of GNU/Linux and/or Firefox running on a
> public library computer. It is not "perfectly reasonable" for anybody
> but yourself to demand that the library will then consequently be
> forced to hand out copies of the source code on demand.
>
> Not even the FSF has such a contorted view of things.
>
> Do you want me to ask the FSF?
You are the confused person. I have no doubt about the outcome.
> If you say `yes', then I'll send the following question to legal@:
> Must a library the runs a modified version of GNU Emacs provide the
> source code for this modified version of GNU Emacs to the users who
> use the libraries (public) system?
>
> If you don't like the question, feel free to rephrase it in some
> manner that suits you.
You could try to make it grammatical.
> > Please David, learn to read instead of resorting to Terkhovian
> > methods.
>
> Pointing out that your views are not shared by anybody else is
> hardly "Terkhovian".
>
> Pointing out views which have no relation to my opinion about
> whatever matter is Terkhovian. This wasn't about redistributing
> in-house programs, it was was redistribution of _public_ programs.
No, it wasn't. It was about in-house programs used for providing a
public service. And your name-calling does not help in muddling your
confusion.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, (continued)
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, John Hasler, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/18