[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and inhouse use?
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and inhouse use? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 May 2006 01:00:17 +0200 (CEST) |
> Pointing out views which have no relation to my opinion about
> whatever matter is Terkhovian. This wasn't about redistributing
> in-house programs, it was was redistribution of _public_
> programs.
No, it wasn't. It was about in-house programs used for providing a
public service.
"I was answering a specific concern `code that offers a service to the
public'."
No, nothing in-house in there. I'd quote more parts, if I could find
the old message. Please read, please follow the thread, please stop
being a jack ass.
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, (continued)
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, John Hasler, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/05/17