[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:56:29 -0000 |
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>
> > RayLopez99 wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jun 4, 5:40 am, RJack <u...@example.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Erik Andersen continues to claim ownership of BusyBox v0.60.2 although
> >> > he has contributed no executable code to the compiled BusyBox binary at
> >> > all -- it doesn't get any more dishonest than this. It would be a
> >> > toss-up to decide who is the bigger liar -- The Sofware Freedom
> >> > Conservancy INC or SCO Inc.
> >> >
> >> > If Western Digital's attorneys allow this rank, fraudulent request for
> >> > default judgment to proceed, they should be restricted to practicing law
> >> > in Siberia.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Right. And they won't. This is just another IP troll attempt, this
> >> time by the Linux crowd, to extract money from corporations in the
> >> legal arena after having failed in the marketplace. Opera browser did
> >> it with Microsoft in Europe.
> >
> > No sane 'troll' would move against utterly assetless and bankrupt
> > defendant.
>
> If he's in for the money, sure.
>
> > See "California State equivalent to bankruptcy" in
> >
> > http://www.terekhov.de/BestBuy-117-4.pdf
> >
> > What does the SFLC really want to achieve moving against defenceless
> > assetless bankrupt entity?
>
> Compliance.
The defendant is an assetless bankrupt you idiot.
http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2008/03/articles/the-financially-troubled-compa/assignments-for-the-benefit-of-creditors-simple-as-abc/
"The ABC is an insolvency proceeding governed by state law rather than
federal bankruptcy law. "
> Like always.
Uh retard dak. Read the memorandum, it's not about compliance, stupid.
http://www.terekhov.de/BestBuy-113.pdf
So once again:
What does the SFLC really want to achieve moving against defenceless
assetless bankrupt entity?
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, (continued)
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, voodoo, 2010/12/09
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, RayLopez99, 2010/12/09
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, Chris Ahlstrom, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08