Re: [Help-glpk] Gusek / Scite2003 Linux and (Mac OS X?)

[Luiz M. M. Bettoni]

Maybe, we can try. Are you using TextAdept?
Sounds good, based on Scite (can be easier migrate), flexible, but it is 
relatively new and not so popular / stable...
It will make Gusek less portable (needs GTK+2 runtime), but can be a 
better option make it more cross-platform than portable.

My last idea was convert Gusek into a plugin to an text-editor, avoiding 
rebuilds and code changing after every new version of the base 
text-editor. Or directly incorporate the GLPK languages in the source 
editor, as well. But it can be more complex to the final user. I'm not 
sure yet. By the way, this changes has no short-time prevision if 
depends only on my effort - i'm writing my msc. thesis now (it make some 
people crazy, you know? =)

Someone has another suggestions?

Luiz Bettoni


At 17-02-2010 12:20, Jeffrey Kantor wrote:
> What about TextAdept?  Lua extensible and cross-platform.  Would that 
> be a decent foundation for a cross-platform GMPL development 
> environment. ( I'm a fan of Gusek, but need to meet the needs of our 
> students who definitely live in a cross-platform world.)
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Luiz M. M. Bettoni 
> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> 
> wrote:
>
>     Hi, Noli.
>
>     Gusek was build to run under windows, and the Scite-RU applied
>     patches are only for windows. So, rebuild it under Linux isn't a
>     good idea. Without Scite-RU and other minor patches, Gusek is
>     basically Scite with GLPK configuration files (and it's configured
>     to win32).
>
>     Port it to Linux is a old project. As you say, GLPK and Scite
>     itself can run under Linux. So, why not Gusek? Because there are
>     no interested developers.
>
>     To start, one can install Scite and GLPK specific packages (i.e.,
>     deb or rpm) and re-write the configuration files using Gusek ones.
>     I'm now using linux, and i've tested Scite+GLPK under it a time
>     ago. It can be done, but Scite runs quite slowly under Ubuntu
>     9.04/9.10, and the absence of Scite-RU improvements make it hard
>     to use.
>
>     If someone has interest, we can discuss - and, maybe, make an
>     effort an rewrite Gusek as a plugin to some cross-platform editor
>     (like Scite itself, or Geany), but will require a lot of work.
>
>     Hugs,
>     Luiz Bettoni
>
>
>     At -10-01--28163 16:59, Noli Sicad wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         Has anybody tried to compile Gusek / Scite203 in Linux?
>
>         The source code can reached by SVN:
>         https://gusek.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gusek/trunk
>
>         SVN on Linux
>         http://wiki.greenstone.o
>         rg/wiki/index.php/Install_SVN_on_Linux
>
>         I think in theory GUSEK can be compiled in Linux since Scite203
>         tarball can be compiled properly in Linux.
>
>         http://sourceforge.net/projects/scintilla/files/
>
>         Donwload scite203 and make use of the configure make and make
>         install
>         fro the linux tar and use it in Gusek.
>
>         Gusek is based on
>         http://code.google.com/p/scite-ru/
>
>         Having GUSEK in Linux will be good.  I think problem is compiling
>         GUSEK in Mac OS X. Mac OS users are using Komodo Edit (FOSS as
>         well)
>         with scintallia
>
>         I don't have any linux machine at this moment, nor dual boot
>         laptop. I
>         will probably buy a bigger hard drive so I can have 2 booting
>         laptop.
>
>         Regards, Noli
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Help-glpk mailing list
>     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>     http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk