[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document.
|
From: |
Craig Kelley |
|
Subject: |
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document. |
|
Date: |
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:07:34 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) |
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:17:34 -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
> 4. Emacs by default creates backup documents, you'll find them in
> the same directory as the file you were working on with a tilde
> after the filename. Hopefully XEmacs, which I've never used, does
> the same thing.
The tilde document is the last version; the auto backup will be the
filename surrounded by hash marks (#).
--
The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
namonai at that google email system
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., (continued)
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Richard Taylor, 2004/09/16
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., David Kastrup, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., spike1, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., GreyCloud, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Tim McNamara, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document.,
Craig Kelley <=
- Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Mike Cox, 2004/09/17
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Adrian Aichner, 2004/09/18
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Jesper Harder, 2004/09/18
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Tim McNamara, 2004/09/18
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, kier, 2004/09/18
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Brian Palmer, 2004/09/18