[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document.
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document. |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:39:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> writes:
> Mike Cox wrote:
[a lot of bull]
> In all the years since the 80's have I ever seen emacs or Xemacs
> ever crash on a Prime, a VAX, or under any version of RedHat Linux,
> Caldera Linux, or Sun Solaris.
Oh, I have. And the message he quoted was quite definitely from
XEmacs (of course, you could easily trigger it by sending signal 11 to
an idle XEmacs, which I would not want to rule out as a possibility:
the Lisp backtrace certainly is from a corner of XEmacs that has
nothing to do with editing and little chances of core dumps).
> This folks is a pure outright lie and a troll.
Obviously. But not because he claimed Emacs/XEmacs can crash. They
certainly can, in particular if you are using developer versions or
playing around with new functionality heavily. The consequences
rarely are serious: after all, autosave files exist.
> It just goes to show you how low some trolls will go to FUD the Open
> Source community.
As if cola-baiting was an uncommon occurence. I think he does it more
for fun than any deeper cause.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., (continued)
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/09/16
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Richard Taylor, 2004/09/16
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., David Kastrup, 2004/09/17
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., spike1, 2004/09/17
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., GreyCloud, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document.,
David Kastrup <=
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Tim McNamara, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Craig Kelley, 2004/09/17
- Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Mike Cox, 2004/09/17
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Adrian Aichner, 2004/09/18
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Jesper Harder, 2004/09/18
Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Tim McNamara, 2004/09/18