Re: No need for CC, please

[Thomas Schwinge]

On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 06:08:37PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 04:16:26AM -0400, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> 
> > Hm.  You could drop mail that has address@hidden in the To: or Cc:
> > header, but doesn't have a List-Id: header.  That's the only way I can
> > imagine right now (at least without constructing a more convoluted
> > scenario); Mailman can't do anything for you, since you'll always get the
> > direct reply from a third party, i.e. without any list headers, etc.
> > (That's also why Olaf's suggestion in <address@hidden>
> > won't work, if I understood it correctly.)
> 
> What suggestion?...

In <address@hidden> you wrote:

| AFAIK mutt only looks at the addresses when doing list-reply, not how
| the mails arrived. So it shouldn't matter whether you reply to the list
| copy or the CC.

... which of course won't work for the direct copies you get, as they
don't have any List-* headers.


Regards,
 Thomas