[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No need for CC, please
From: |
Bas Wijnen |
Subject: |
Re: No need for CC, please |
Date: |
Tue, 2 May 2006 19:47:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 06:28:12PM +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> I still want to receive emails by the list, to read the emails in the
> list inbox, with all others, which for the moment has always seemed to
> be the most sensible way to do it.
>
> Could you suggest a way to use the mailman header to avoid the annoyance
> of the mails going in my personal inbox?
What you can do is filter all mails which have address@hidden in To or Cc
into the list box, and not request the extra copy. The list blocks all mail
that isn't explicitly addressed to it (that is, only via Bcc).
Of course then your mail client doesn't know that the e-mail also went to the
list, and in particular, which list, so "list reply" doesn't work.
Thanks,
Bas
--
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/01
- Re: No need for CC, please, Marco Gerards, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Jeroen Dekkers, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please,
Bas Wijnen <=
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/09
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/09
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/11
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/11