[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No need for CC, please
From: |
Pierre THIERRY |
Subject: |
Re: No need for CC, please |
Date: |
Wed, 3 May 2006 11:29:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
Scribit address@hidden dies 02/05/2006 hora 23:36:
> AFAIK mutt only looks at the addresses when doing list-reply, not how
> the mails arrived. So it shouldn't matter whether you reply to the
> list copy or the CC.
How could mutt guess that an address is a mailing list? It does know how
to reply to the list because there are List-* headers. Which are
obviously not in the mail I received in CC.
Technically,
Nowhere man
--
address@hidden
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/01
- Re: No need for CC, please, Marco Gerards, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Jeroen Dekkers, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please,
Pierre THIERRY <=
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/09
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/09
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/11
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/11
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/13
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02